Mauri Sirén

I am in Love and I don´t know if I should order cyanide or order champagne?
Perhaps new music comin finally. In this state of mind it is fun to see what kind of music is comin this time. Please behave and wait.
Mauri

Dear whoever is reading this, we don´t know eachother and there is a strong possibility we might never meet, but we wish nothing but the best and happiness for you.
Listen us in Spotify.
-Mauri-

I believe that antitheses (quarrels) have a constant order, development really requires them. If the antitheses seem incorrect, it only tells you that the theses are hidden. Theses must be made open so that antitheses can be properly aligned. The stigma of the closed society — hidden theses — takes us to unknown roads and under unknown guidance. The accuracy of the "map" requires a broad perspective, in which case all those who have disputed must take into account that we stay on the road and that we find our destination with the help of the map. -There-? Unfortunately, our destination has never been revealed by anyone anywhere. Do we know exactly where we are going? At least I don't know. However, I know that on this journey to something, Greenpeace offers the controversies that development and map accuracy require. Disagreements and reminders about environmental protection must be taken into account, despite the fact that we know nothing about the future. To know something about the future would require a premise of the absolute regularity of the world, so that we could know the future from what has already happened. We would thus justify an inductive conclusion. When we do not know the future, in the eliminative induction, the last remissions to protect life and the planet must be removed last, all other premises are secondary.

Hey You all! Sorry that You haven´t heard of me. I´ve been busy writing my next book. It´s going to be in finnish and the title is Incomitatus (alone). Some sunny day I will translate it. It´s all about objective truths among people and if there are existing such. Have a perfect day. You will be in my thoughts. All the best. -Mauri-

Hey you all. I want to wish you blessed christmas and better new year 2020 with these Bob Dylan words.
May God bless and keep you always,
May your wishes all come true,
May you always do for others
And let others do for you.
May you build a ladder to the stars
And climb on every rung,
May you stay forever young,

May you grow up to be righteous,
May you grow up to be true,
May you always know the truth
And see the lights surrounding you.
May you always be courageous,
Stand upright and be strong,
May you stay forever young,

-Mauri-

"My son, I wish you knew how to control this world with a little intelligence"
Axel Oxenstierna uttered these words to his son when his son doubted his ability to represent Sweden among experienced statesman and diplomat in the Westfalen peace talks in 1648.
Old statesman left us an "apocryphal" message for posterity?
What kind of information do we control today?
Has the situation changed in 350 years since those days of Axel Oxenstierna? After all, today we talk about objectivity and the truth of something, generally. One thing is true and another is false. I agree with the X, he had an interview with the president who also agreed? Since all our friends will agree with me, I'm definitely in the right opinion about you and, therefore, you got it wrong in your opinions about yourself. So your arguments are false. The larger the masses agree, the more the basis for the truth of the matter will change. So there are more and less real things. The truth is interpreted and cataloged. Among other things in court? Every day.
The righteous also stood by me. So I am also legally correct. The fall was not even significant for the court. Don't you realize you have to be wrong?
Something is true because I have objective information about it. The chain of evidence is staggering. Everything is crowned by self-authorizing authorities, who, by virtue of their position, are expected to make only objective statements in accordance with their self-evident attributes, that is, with the moral obligation.
What if empiric observation based objective information does not exist?

-Mauri Sirén-

Induction and mere Empiricism are almost true.

Because no one outside that philosopher's glass tower knows anything about inductive reasoning? This ignorance of induction and empiricism made me think about a new attitude to induction. Nobody in there knows (expired link) chicken-like induction, does not know that the sunrise, nor the inductance of the laws of physics are inductive. That is why I think that induction should be brought to a better position and a proper relationship with the truth. It is inconceivable that this has not been done before? As if the secret society had deliberately wanted to continue this kind of proven nesting difference from ordinary people.
The brief statement of philosophy of science for mere empiricism is that it is not enough for the philosophy of science. Nor do ordinary people know it, and where it leads?
I've got to hear from a statistical economic that they teach that the empirical research which includes at least a thousand people is fully qualified research. So the university has learned to understand that empirical research with a particular mass is true. Unfortunately, the basics of the truth of any matter are not affected by how many people believe it to be the same, and mere empiricism is not enough for science philosophy.

All observations based should always be classified as uncertain and inductive reasoning always unreliable. The inductively determined maximum is the right enlightened guess and not the truth. This tells everyone immediately that just the observation is the basis. The adjacent room's blue cushion is an enlightened guess that can be proved by several similar findings, guessings. The colour of the pillow is just a guesswork made with observations, never the truth. Thus separating truth and induction from one another would make people understand the uncertainties of induction and empiricism and immediately recognize their journey as an induction and as a maximum of enlightened guesswork and mere empiricism inadequate.
All people should be aware of the lack of inductive reasoning and empiricism. The mere findings do not reach the truth ever? There is always a doubt about perception and generalization.

I think that between the book covers of the history of religions, rises the smell of burning human flesh and the screams of the innocent.
In his religious beliefs, man is foolish and fools should be forgiven by fools. It is insurmountable that I have never realized anything about religions. No one else ever figured out anything about religions, and that's why people have fought each other and killed each other.

Voltaire has, in 1764, taken a position on the Egyptians in his book "Philosophical Dictionary".

Apis v. 1764.
Was Apis Taurus worshiped in Memphis as a god, a symbol, or a bull? There is reason to believe that the fanatics saw in him a god, wise only a symbol, while a stupid people worshiped the bull. Did Cambysia act wisely when he killed this bull by hand when he conquered Egypt? Why not? They were forced to see that their God could be put on the skewer without the nature reappearing such sacredness. The Egyptians have been greatly praised. I myself do not know the more despicable people: in their nature and in their administration, there has always been a fundamental fault that has always made them miserable slaves. I admit that, in times of almost sleepy times, they might have been world conquerors; The French lost the battle on the map of mammals. (v.1250 Seventh Crusade, when King Louis IX of France was imprisoned in Egypt)
There may be only two tolerable features in the Egyptians: first, these worshipers of bulls never tried to force monkey worshipers to change their religion, and secondly, they have always been able to bury egg chicks in the oven.
The pyramids are praised, but they are the monuments of the slavery. The whole nation was supposed to be put down, otherwise these rocks would never have been erected. Where were they needed?
To keep a mummy of a ruler or governor or superintendent in a small chamber, whose soul was supposed to revive after a thousand years.
But if they hoped for the resurrection of their body, why the brain was removed before it was scaled down?
Was the intention that the Egyptians would come to life without brains?


Voltaire

Hi You all! There are 8 songs in Spotify. You will find them using name Mauri Sirén and the Band. Writing that was about Voltaire and the Egyptians was too long to publish. Next time more. All the Best. Thank You. - Mauri -

Hey. iTunes seems to have some kind of problem. When You write my name it informs that name does´n exist, but when You write the name again it opens my page in iTunes. Try harder. All the best.
Altruism.
Altruism can also be examined in psychology through the theory of social learning. It looks at altruism is an acquired property. According to it, altruism is an object obtained from parents, authorities or other close ones. The theory does not comment on the ultimate motive of altruistic acts. According to psychological egoism, man always behaves selfishly, no matter what the actions may look like. Man can seemingly own his entire life to help others, but the ultimate cause would be selfish. For example, he can enjoy the altruistic acts, and the pleasure would be the ultimate egoistic motive. Studies has shown that altruistic acts activate in brains same areas than food and sex. Thus, the author's pleasure can explain at least some of the altruism.
-Mauri -

Hey. Thank You for buying my album. All the best.

The World is beautiful.

The world is beautiful and good to Live
to one who has time and space for Dreams
and freedom of Mind.
There is the freedom to listen to the silence of the Forest
when a morning sun hits the golden Cliffs
and live your Life.
You are free to monitor summer nights
and watch the vibrations of a quiet Aspen
and live your Life.
There is the freedom to be alone and awake in the summer night
exploring your own inner world
and live Your Life.
The world is beautiful and good to live
to one who has time and space for Dreams
and freedom of Mind.
- Mauri -

Hi. I am sorry that You can´t get directly from here to my page in iTunes. The "buy"button moves You to iTunes and there You have to select "store" and write Mauri Sirén and you get to my page to select one Song or album. Album is 7,92€. So many have bought my album. Thank You.
Here is my latest writing.

Antithesis is not negativity or populism.
According to what I have read today I am both populist and racist? What has happened to me, - or has the environment changed? Who defines populism - of course, those in power.
I believe, as I have always believed that the antithesis are necessarily required, any kind of development requires antithesis, and they are not negativity and populism. To be able to target antithesis correctly, the thesis should be open. In our closed society we are not offered open thesis. Real intentions are encrypted. The antithesis creators have to guess the thesis and then the antithesis are not necessarily directed correctly and the right synthesis is not created, and our Map is not accurate. As Yo-men in recession, we would be ideal and much needed supporters of the elite. Dogmatic sleep and fatalism are the greatest problems of our time, but greatly appreciated by the elite. Fatalist statements are "fate is overwhelming" and "nothing can be done". I'm a racist because I believe that for us there is the maximum number of refugees. While everything is financially defined today, we have a ceiling what the refugees can cost to us. Today we are living with the continual debt, so I think we are not in a situation where we can support refugees who haven´t integrated in any European country, but still demand their laws and customs instead of ours. Oh, if you don't accept this, you too are racist. So are we all racists?